Wheel of life
availableWhere does my life need attention now?
Origin, purpose and limits
Where the idea comes from
A coaching exercise used in Co-Active Coaching: rate satisfaction across life areas and examine the shape.
Our version
AIM adds editable areas, comparison layers and a two-week experiment. PERMA-H is a set of area labels here; the PERMA questionnaire is not administered.
Why a visual interface
An overlay makes uneven areas and changes between dates visible together. The shape helps you choose a focus.
With an agent
A conversation can help explain a score. Export your map so the agent can ask about one concrete difference.
What you take away
One area, a small action and a date to look again.
How to interpret it
Self-ratings depend on your context. A round wheel and a score of ten in every area are optional; no diagnostic interpretation is built in.
Values
availableWhat matters to me, and how does it show up in my actions?
Origin, purpose and limits
Where the idea comes from
Two practices: Personal Values Card Sort by Miller, C’de Baca, Matthews and Wilbourne (2001), and Tobias Lundgren’s Bull’s Eye in ACT.
Our version
AIM combines its own 42-word deck, five chosen values, four life areas, a 0–10 action rating and a weekly step. This combination is an adaptation; the original survey’s validation does not establish validity for this app.
Why a visual interface
The centre means your recent actions express a value fully (10); the edge means little expression (0). Distance represents action alignment. Angle only groups values by life area. On the wheel, ten is at the outer edge; on this target, ten is at the centre.
With an agent
You can do the whole exercise with an agent. The board keeps all five values visible at once; an agent can help examine a conflict and formulate a feasible step. Copy the context deliberately.
What you take away
Choose a value, name one recent example and one action for the next seven days. Example: connection → call a friend on Thursday.
How to interpret it
A point far from the centre is a question to explore. You decide whether to act on it. Ratings describe this period and carry no personality or clinical diagnosis.
Energy map
availableWhich activities give energy, and which important ones need a different arrangement?
Origin, purpose and limits
Where the idea comes from
An original AIM reflection canvas (2026). It combines two ordinary self-ratings: energy after an activity and its personal importance.
Our version
Rate actual activities from the last seven days, place them on two axes and choose one experiment. No external questionnaire is scored.
Why a visual interface
A meaningful but draining activity appears separately from easy, low-importance activity. Moving a point tests your interpretation; it does not change what happened.
With an agent
Export a compact note and ask an agent for alternative ways to do one draining activity. The choice and ratings stay yours.
What you take away
One experiment: do more, change the conditions, delegate, reduce or deliberately keep as is.
How to interpret it
An author-created reflection aid with no psychometric validation. Energy is a subjective observation; importance does not imply an obligation to continue.
Source: AIM author-created model, 2026.
Krest
availableWhat changes when I view a day through four directions?
Origin, purpose and limits
Where the idea comes from
An AIM product model: obligations, resources, past and future.
Our version
The web page offers fictional examples. The Mac app uses the sources you configure and keeps an observation history.
Why a visual interface
Four directions keep competing demands visible together. History compares compatible observations.
With an agent
An agent can help interpret an observation. Source coverage and your judgement still matter.
What you take away
One deliberate change to the day.
How to interpret it
An author-created lens; no validated psychological score is claimed.
Source: AIM author-created model, 2026.
Dilts levels
idea · no release dateAt what level am I describing a change?
Origin, purpose and limits
Where the idea comes from
Robert Dilts’s logical levels, developed within NLP with reference to Gregory Bateson.
Our version
Candidate: a stack of questions about context, action, skills, beliefs, identity and purpose.
Why a visual interface
A stacked view could reveal that a practical problem is being described as an identity judgement.
With an agent
A conversation can ask the same questions. Build the canvas only if comparing levels makes the answer clearer.
What you take away
A revised description and one practical action.
How to interpret it
A coaching model. We do not infer a cause or a weak level from a score. No release date is promised.
Year review
idea · no release dateWhich experiences should I repeat or redesign?
Origin, purpose and limits
Where the idea comes from
Inspired by structured retrospective journals such as YearCompass.
Our version
Candidate: a timeline of your own observations with evidence and a next-period choice.
Why a visual interface
A timeline can show recurring clusters that get lost in a long conversation.
With an agent
An agent can interview you and draft a synthesis; you check it against the timeline.
What you take away
A short repeat / change list.
How to interpret it
A reflection proposal; calendar access and automatic import are not implemented.
Strengths context
idea · no release dateHow do I explain useful patterns to my agent?
Origin, purpose and limits
Where the idea comes from
An AIM proposal for organising results and examples you choose to bring.
Our version
No proprietary tests or question sets are reproduced. A future version would preserve source, date and your corrections.
Why a visual interface
A visual interface must earn its place through comparing examples; a short note may be enough.
With an agent
An agent can already help organise a report you are allowed to share.
What you take away
A user-reviewed context note.
How to interpret it
Idea only. Test results would retain their original limits; no personality inference from chat history.
Source: AIM author-created model, 2026.
